Review the work, not the transcript
Agent output arrives as a review with inline comments on real lines — not a wall of chat you have to diff by eye.
Why this hurts today
When an agent finishes, you get prose. Deciding whether to trust it means reading a long reply, mapping claims back to files, and re-checking the ones that matter.
The review surface you already know — inline comments against a diff — is sitting right there, unused.
How it works
- 01
The run opens a review
Instead of summarizing, the agent opens a review and attaches comments to specific lines and artifacts.
- 02
Comments compile into structured feedback
Overlays collect into feedback with severity, file, and rationale — a shape the next agent can act on directly.
- 03
You approve a diff, not a story
You read a review. The next run reads your replies and picks up the requested changes.
Connect your agent
Point any MCP client at your organization's endpoint. Agents authenticate with OAuth or a minted API key — no browser, no screen.
claude mcp add --transport http agentonomi \
https://agentonomi.com/your-org/endpoint/default/mcpDomains in play
What changes
Agent work gets the same scrutiny surface as human work — because it is the same surface.
Other use cases
Hand off between agents without re-explaining
An agent hits its context limit at 2am. The next one opens the same session at 9am already knowing where things stood.
PlanningA backlog your agents write and groom themselves
Your agent files what it found, sizes it, and moves the card — so the board reflects the work instead of trailing behind it.
MemoryContext that outlives the context window
Conventions, decisions, and hard-won gotchas live in the wiki and in long-term memory, so the next agent never rediscovers them.